
Sawlogs take a long time to grow! Decades long!!
So if you are a sawmiller looking to secure your resource/business beyond next week or next year, you need to be aggressive in the market place.
Selling sawn timber is fine but if there are no sawlogs coming in, then its game over.
Under the unique resource conditions of the forest industry it could be argued that for a sawmiller, buying sawlogs is actually more important than selling timber!
So here is one sawmiller from Ashville, North Carolina, USA who is very aggressive and up front about securing their future.
http://sunrisesawmill.com/
This sawmill provides a current table of prices they are prepared to pay forest growers for logs delivered to their mill, by species and log grade.
I have never seen a sawmiller in Australia who actively seeks to buy sawlogs in the open market like this.
This is one Radical Sawmiller!
http://sunrisesawmill.com/log-prices/
Converting these prices into something that Australian/New Zealand readers can understand is problematic because:
- Americans trade logs using board feet (12” x 1” x 1”) as a volume measure; and
- They confuse the log pricing issue even more by then applying a sawn recovery scaling factor so that the board foot volume changes depending upon the small end diameter of the log. Sunrise use the Doyle Log scaling factor.
The use of a log scaling factor makes the job of the forest grower even more difficult than it already is!
The job of the forest grower should be to grow quality and size/volume. It should be the responsibility of the log buyer to then recover the best value from the logs via markets and/or technology.
The Doyle Log scaling factor uses the log small end diameter (under bark) and log length. There is no allowance for log taper.
So I took the Doyle Table provided by Sunrise Sawmills and did a bit of maths to produce the following chart. As a straight forward conversion there are 424 board feet (BF) in a cubic metre (CUM). With the Doyle Log Scaling factor the number of board feet per cubic metre in a log increases as the diameter increases as the chart shows. This is to account for the fact that sawn recovery increases as log diameter increases. So in the USA log buyers only buy based on a notional “recovery”. The grower pays for wastage. In Australia and New Zealand logs are traded based on total log volume, with the buyers then responsible for maximising the value from the log.
I also did some calculations to see what effect a 2% log taper would have. Obvious it means that the grower is paying for even more waste (less recovery).

On the positive side you could say that using the Doyle Scaling factor encourages/rewards growers for growing bigger trees, with larger logs getting three times the price of smaller logs.
But my feeling is that using this method for trading logs just confuses the issues.
With this chart in mind it is interesting to note the price difference at Sunrise between the veneer vs the prime sawlog. With veneer logs it is possible to get over 95% recovery. So in terms of volume recovered, the veneer and prime sawlogs are essentially the same price! But appearance grade veneer sells for much more by volume than sawn timber. These prices don’t quite add up.
These guys even have their own Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/Sunrise-Sawmill-193257651998/
It is good to see a sawmiller who understands the importance of aggressive transparent marketing in buying sawlogs and securing their future.
The question remains outstanding; does this aggressive marketing and log prices translate into a prosperous community of forest growers in North Carolina?
For Australian readers it needs to be understood that the eastern USA forest industry is entirely dominated by private forest owners. There is no logging of public native forest in the eastern USA. No subsidised sawlogs. If you are a sawmiller in the eastern USA you need to be low cost, efficient and aggressive in the marketplace. It’s all business; no politics! Just like in New Zealand there is no such thing as “resource security” in the forest industry in the USA. Such a concept doesn’t exist!
Oh how I wish this would happen in Australia.
The only basis for a successful forest industry is profitable tree growing (and radical sawmillers).
PS. A target blackwood plantation sawlog (60cm dbh pruned 6m) has approx 360 board feet by the Doyle Scaling factor. At $US1,000 per 1000 MF (Sunrise price for Black Walnut) that equates to $US360 per log. At the current exchange rate of $AU0.80 to $US1.00 that equates to $AU450 per log mill door. In my books that is a pretty acceptable price…….for a premium sawlog. For a premium veneer log I’d be expecting much, much more.
The Radical Sawmill #2
Some further thoughts on The Radical Sawmill and the Doyle Log Scaling Factor.
https://blackwoodgrowers.com.au/2017/09/04/the-radical-sawmill/
The American system of trading logs based on the Doyle Scaling factor means that every sale begins with the premise
“this log is a liability, the grower must be penalised”,
instead of
“this log is an opportunity, the grower must be encouraged to grow more quality logs”.
You would think under these negative conditions any serious forest grower would set up their own sawmill and do their own milling.
Why would a forest grower sell logs into such a punitive market?
Forest Grower and Sawmilling Cooperatives should be the order of the day in the USA.
For a forest industry looking to build its future the Doyle Log Scale is a very bad idea. It does nothing but send a negative message to the market.
Not that the forest products market in Australia is any better. We have our own unique set of punitive measures to discourage private tree growers. But at least we do trade logs based on the small end or mid diameters. Or even a total log volume estimate based on SED and LED. The log is traded as an opportunity not a liability.
The Sunrise Sawmill in Ashville, North Carolina is obviously a small business, with limited resources for marketing and promotion.
How much is it really thinking about the future of the forest industry in North Carolina?
The State of North Carolina encourages private forest owners to develop a “Woodland Management Plan”.
http://ncforestservice.gov/Managing_your_forest/why_do_i_need_a_plan.htm
One of the objectives of these Plans is to improve the productivity and commercial value of the private forest through active management.
If I was a sawmiller thinking beyond my own needs to the future of the broader industry:
In fact the more I think about this the more I realise that whilst the sawlog may be important for the sawmiller for today, this week or this month; what is ultimately more important is the forest grower. How important is this forest grower to the sawmiller and the broader industry? That is the ultimate question for the sawmiller!
Greater log price transparency is a great beginning to help build the forest industry, but I suspect that much more is needed from the forest industry. The New Zealand experience supports this view. A broad level of industry/market support and encouragement is needed for landowners/forest owners to consider investing time and money over such a long period to grow quality wood.
As for North Carolina, North Carolina is home to 18.6 million acres (7.5 million ha) of forestland, 85% (6.4 million ha) of which is privately owned. Approximately 64% of these privately held lands are owned by non-industrial landowners. Despite the enormous growth our state has witnessed, 60% of North Carolina is still covered by forests.
https://www.ncforestry.org/nc-forest-data/forest-products-industry-in-north-carolina/
I wonder how many of these NC private forest owners have Woodland Management Plans?
Leave a comment
Posted in Commentary